Issue Management
- Issue capturing
- Issue monitoring
- Issue analysis 8D
- Objective data collation
- Report Generation
Durability & Measurements
On road Fleet and Durability Testing in PAN India and Global Locations.
24x7 Operations for Fleet Management
Robust Drive Training, Drive Evaluation and Selection Process.
Performance Testing on Test Track, Specific Road Profiles and Terrains
Testing Support
- Camouflaging
- Mannequin
- Driver & Engineer
- Test planning & execution
- Vehicle Logistics
Test Equipment's
- Data logger
- GPS & Monitoring
- Dash camera
- Tools & Instruments
Testing
- Braking & Acceleration
- Gradeability
- On road PEMS
- OBD testing and many more
Component – Durability & Performance
We are committed to ensuring the highest standards of quality and reliability in components' testing. To achieve this, we conduct a comprehensive range of durability and performance tests, including Vehicle Simulation Setup for E&E Components, Bench Testing for Switches, and Sun visor Durability Testing.
Virtual Validation
A Versatile Tool that enables users to configure, develop, run simulations, and analyze results for vehicle models and driver behavior, allowing testing and validation across various application cases.
- Vehicle Configuration
- Terrain Setting
- Scenario Creation
Vehicle Configuration
Configuration Levels
General vehicle configurations
- Mass
- Track, wheel base
- Ride height
- CG height etc.
Tires
- Rolling resistance
- Free radius
- Reference load
- Etc.,
Suspension configuration
- Frequency
- Bounce & Rebound course
- Bounce & Rebound efficiency
Steering wheel
- Wheel reference
- Max angle int & ext
- Etc.,
Aerodynamics
- CD
- CL
- CS
- Attack angle etc..
Engine & Transmission
- Max torque
- Max Power
- Engine type
- Gear ratio
- Etc.,
Terrain setting
GROUND
- ASPHALT
- CONCRETE
- GRASS
- COBBLESTONE
MARKINGS
- Left to Right
- Cannot cross
- Pull back
- Etc.,
Surface Texture additions
- Texture type
- Roughness
- Etc.,
Lane & Road building
- Circle arc
- Altitude
- Etc.
| Ground Name | Asphalt |
| Ground Type | Asphalt |
| Grip | 1 |
| Water Level | 0mm |
| Rouhness Type | Analytic |
| Analytic Roughness | |
| Height(Mm) | 5mm |
| Length(Mm) | 10mm |
| Height Standard Deviation (Mm) | 0mm |
| Length Standard Deviation (Mm) | 0mm |
| SOFT GROUND | |
| Humidity | 0.05 |
| Volumetric Mass | 1000kg/M3 |
| Cone Index | 0kpa |
| C:Ground Cohesion | 20kpa |
| phi: Ground Friction Angle | 150 |
| Soft Ground Type | Functional Model/Terramechanics Model |
Scenario Creation
| Loop | Scenario | Kms ref | Parameter | Terrain | Weather | Environment | Triger Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | sudden lane change and stopping without indication | 3 | mitigation | urban road | daily rainy | motor Traffic | In 3kms of loop a swarm vehicle is triggered at distance of 20 meters. |
| 1 | sudden lane change and stopping without indication | 3 | Alter driving | urban road | daily rainy | motor Traffic | In 3kms of loop a swarm vehicle is triggered at distance of 20 meters. |
| 2 | sudden lane change and stopping without indication | 3 | maneuvering | urban road | daily rainy | motor Traffic | In 3kms of loop a swarm vehicle is triggered at distance of 20 meters. |
| 1 | sudden lane change and stopping without indication | 3 | Complaint driving | urban road | daily rainy | motor Traffic | In 3kms of loop a swarm vehicle is triggered at distance of 20 meters. |
CAN / Network Validation
CAN (Controller Area Network) network validation. It highlights the essential role of validating communication protocols within a CAN network, emphasizing the accurate transmission and reception of messages among electronic control units (ECUs). The importance of this validation is underscored in its contribution to ensuring the optimal performance and functionality of systems utilizing CAN communication, particularly in diverse applications such as automotive and industrial systems.
E&E Testing
HARNESS LAYOUTS & TESTING ANALYSIS
PCB Inspection & Testing
Rapid and Reliable Inspection of PCBs with Digital Microscopy
3D image is important for inspecting PCBs, then a microscope image is required.
Efficient screening and document more results in less time using a digital microscope with camera.
Functional verification
Error Mode Verification
Error Strategy & DTC verification
Diagnostic verification & validation
Need for Corrosion evaluation
- 1. In modern vehicles, manufacturers has to suffice statutory requirements, to make Products with longer life & Customer pocket friendly
- 2. Manufacturers adapt various methods like weight reduction to provide vehicles which are highly Fuel efficient & also use high strength steel for structural strength to cope up with crash norms for vehicle crashworthiness
- 3. Vehicles made has to undergo tough environment conditions which should be durable enough to withstand customer application
- 4. Corrosion being one of the likely aspect which vehicle are bound to have after each year of use
- 5. It becomes necessary to have a corrosion evaluation process @ finished vehicle level to support manufacturers to tune their product to meet the demanding current customer expectations, so CAPCP Engineering services has come up with an “Corrosion Evaluation Procedure” which will evaluate the vehicle at different aspects
Corrosion evaluation procedure used by CAPCP Engineering services will evaluate the vehicles with 4 steps evaluation procedure with the appropriate rating scale, Corrosion action priority score will be arrived based on resultant rating proportionate to service life of vehicle
Evaluation scales & Action priority score calculation
| Corrosion Rating scale (1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photo | No corrosion |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Stage of corrosion | No corrosion | Light rust, Blushing or discoloration of surface | Little blistering and rust, No scaling, paint peeling or metal loss | Blistering, heavy rust, scabbing and rust bleed, Small amounts of metal and paint peeling | Severe rusting and Scabbing, Heavy flakes and layers removed | Large chunks falling off, perforations, Non functional or non serviceable |
| Rating | Level 0 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| How customers will perceive? | No Problem | Not acceptable | Not acceptable | Not acceptable | Not acceptable | Not acceptable |
| Colour code | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour code | Vehicle areas & Weightage | Description | |||
| RED | 1.Underfloor - Central | 10 | Vehicle Aggregates / Parts which have a direct more frequent exposure to corrosion acceleration factors like water / stone chip / sand / muck / mud etc... | ||
| 2.Underfloor - Front | 9 | ||||
| 3.Underbody - Rear | 9 | ||||
| 4.Engine room | 8 | ||||
| 5.Boot area | 7 | ||||
| 6.Cowl top | 6 | ||||
| 7.Exterior | 9 | ||||
| Yellow | 8.Interior | 4 | Vehicle Aggregates / Parts which have a direct very limited (or) almost no exposure to corrosion acceleration factors like water / stone chip / sand / muck / mud etc... | ||
| Classification with respect to Safety / Non safety parts / aggregates (3) | |
|---|---|
| Description & Weightage | |
| Safety aggregates which will fail without warning which will result in death / fatal injury to either the Product user or road users | 10 |
| Safety aggregates which will fail with warning which will result in death / fatal injury to either the Product user or road users | 9 |
| Non-Safety / Cosmetic aggregates which will be perceived as poor brand Quality by customers | 8 |
| Corrosion infested area & corresponding weightage (4) | |
|---|---|
| Infested area | Weightage |
| ≤ 1mm (Small) | 2 |
| 2mm ~5mm (Medium) | 4 |
| > 5mm (Large) | 8 |
Action Priority score = Corrosion rating scale (1) X Zone Classification (2) X Safety / non safety parts classification (3) X Corrosion infested area & corresponding weightage (4) / No .of months product was put to use in field
Action priority score inference: Higher the score, More the focus for action
With the above method comprehensive evaluation will be performed to provide the right inputs for the manufacturers to take action